Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in imposing a substantively unreasonable sentence of three hundred months and whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in finding that the Petitioner waived his right to appeal the sentence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether the district court erred and imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence of three hundred months? Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when they found that the Petitioner had waived his right to appeal the sentence imposed? PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 5
Docket Entries
2026-02-06
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2026-01-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 6, 2026.
2025-12-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 7, 2026 to February 6, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 7, 2026)
Attorneys
Kyle Campbell
Nicholas Wright Marchi — Carney & Marchi, Petitioner
Nicholas Wright Marchi — Carney & Marchi, Petitioner
Nicholas Wright Marchi — Carney & Marchi, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent