Whether the district court's judicial bias and alleged procedural errors during the evidentiary hearing warrant reversal of the lower court's judgment

n one Lj_O.CS A >4jff£llt£l£_Cou.rT Errs_r_ar Cowt i~HZ 5-trurfu.rg/ [mr when Wakincj A D i5kone$+Opinion Concluding Tkcr+ The APPei lanTS oF Judicial Bia$ i$ inodeQi^TeK/ 5utpporred D'hen The Record Snauii Thej>is7r?<Tz/ l4rT~ ^lunyes <ac~b on s Mid cenjucT ove rwineiMi/ioiy DispioyThe MoCf EXTrene coje oFciudiCial Bi^-S (/To "He pJrYT ij.F ?emc| CriM-.nn | ^cti on $ ByThe, OiSTticT(oj^t jiAck? ’■ TWODoti J\ AppeHa-fc CourT p&oe\ bispmy Judicial ft'ias ^ao-m'ingy i))3WsToy>nic>n itarino-tkrc< pre.?onderc</<d<x c>FTk Evidence 5uppar7&/jTke DBTHcr Courts 4ppe I kifT violated Qjjec/ ’n I c^ndiTon oFHiS Superv I Si OA,v/hen "Mo Evidence"i>uos pF SSedTcd-OC If ledjTo 6upparT~ k? JjiSTri cT (ou r~E$ " TudgeM<?n7"-rha1 ^ppeiian —'LeFT pork Avenue TcpsCTMenT ■ V)nV\ixn. Ajyrbvd A(nd v/us ^rJcL&rqed >'^J%eonii/ Evident? P>r?f(?n7ed mThe Case wasC/proven perjured "7^-iilAOAy ByU.5.prabfti' ,on oFFitpr Lqufr Kuer s— A a Threedjces A nPp^HcTecourT Error in cc opinion When Tydyiq ’HtfA The Manner in WhicV\7V\^ T^eVoczdioA Fleariyn W^S (onclucTed do AJc-r JupporT Reversal y/tanThe. Recard^Vitjwls P^Vrtk^erHad LHerii/ NO RiqHs 11 Darina Tke 'Reydcct'On Neariog AN wa.s<J)M5 c(TmuI1' V€ Errorf f