Whether a general challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence preserves for de novo review the full range of sufficiency challenges, and whether intrastate internet use in furtherance of a crime necessarily places that crime 'in commerce'

I. Whether a general challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, pursuant to Rule 29(a), preserves for de novo review the full range of sufficiency challenges, stated or unstated. II. Whether the intrastate use the internet , in furtherance of a crime , necessarily places that crime “in commerce,” thereby satisfying th at jurisdictional element of numerous federal offenses. ii INTERESTED PARTIES There are no