No. 25-6367
Luis Daniel Fuentes v. United States
Tags: 3553(a)-factors appellate-review criminal-procedure judicial-discretion mitigating-evidence sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2026-01-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a sentencing court must address mitigating evidence and arguments offered by defense counsel regarding factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) when stating its reasons for its imposition of a particular sentence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
is: Whether a sentencing court m ust address mitigating evidence and arguments offered by defense counsel regarding factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) when stating its reasons for its imposition of a particular sentence?
Docket Entries
2026-01-20
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
2025-12-22
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-12-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2026)
Attorneys
Luis Fuentes
Meghan Collins — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Meghan Collins — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent