Whether a warrant that fails to specifically describe cell phones as an item to be seized violates the Fourth Amendment's particularity requirement in light of Riley v. California

In Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), this Court established that cell phones require enhanced Fourth Amendment privacy protections. The question presented is whether, consistent with Riley, a warrant that fails to particularly describe cell phones as an item to be seized—only listing “computers” and “electronic data storage devices”— violates the Fourth Amendment.