Whether the Supreme Court should issue an extraordinary writ of mandamus where the petitioner has provided documented evidence of fraudulent docket entries which includes overwritten judicial orders, altered metadata, iText-modified PDF's inconsistent judicial signatures, and CM/ECF backend interference that replaced legitimate court filings with fabricated files?

1. Whether the Supreme Court should issue an extraordinary writ of mandamus where the petitioner has provided documented evidence of fraudulent docket entries which includes overwritten judicial orders, altered metadata, iText-modified PDF ’s inconsistent judicial signatures, and CM/ECF backend interference that replaced legitimate court filings with fabricated files? 2. Whether the mandamus is warranted where the petitioner direct appeal was falsely misclassified as interlocutory depriving petitioner of her appellate rights, and to remove the misclassified file 66 from the docket? 3. Whether intervention is necessary where multiple judicial filings were never mailed , where filings were mis-docketed and ignored. And, where both the District Court and the D.C. Circuit have failed to act on the petitioner ’s motions, leaving Ms. Thomas with no adequate alternative remedy? 4. Whether this court should intervene to protect the integrity of the judiciary where the pattern of obstruction began at the Atlanta division EEOC and continued through the defense counsel, and individuals with docket access, and CM/ECF administrators, resulting in the petitioner-a pro-se black woman being denied access to the courts? ii