Whether a defendant challenging a prior state conviction under the crime of violence definitions must produce actual state court decisions showing non-generic application of a facially overbroad statute—as the Fifth Circuit alone requires—or whether the statutory text suffices to demonstrate overbreadth—as every other circuit holds?

Whether a defendant challenging a prior state conviction under the crime of violence definitions must produce actual state court decisions showing non-generic application of a facially overbreadth statute, as the Fifth Circuit alone requires, or whether the statutory text suffices to demonstrate overbreadth, as every other circuit holds?