No. 25-6394

Joshua Abrams v. Richard Isolda

Lower Court: New Jersey
Docketed: 2025-12-17
Status: Pending
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-violation due-process fourteenth-amendment immunity-doctrine judicial-sanctions seventh-amendment
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2026-02-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether immunity doctrines eliminate all remedies for constitutional violations.

2. Whether judicial sanctions imposed as penalties require due process and a jury under the Seventh and Fourteenth Amendments.

3. Whether mandatory third-party access costs unconstitutionally restrict access to justice.

4. Whether the Constitution requires a functional forum for the redress of grievances.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether immunity doctrines eliminate all remedies for constitutional violations and whether judicial sanctions require due process and a jury under the Seventh and Fourteenth Amendments

Docket Entries

2026-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-15
Waiver of right of respondent Richard Isolda to respond filed.
2025-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2026)

Attorneys

Joshua Abrams
Joshua M. Abrams — Petitioner
Richard Isolda
Mark J. MolzMark J. Molz, Respondent