Is a Writ of Audita Querela under 28 USC 1651, the "All Writs Act", applicable where a defendant was barred under the Supreme Court's UNITED STATES v. JONES v. HENDRIX 143 S. Ct 1357, 216 L Ed. 2d 475 (June 22, 2023) where defendant is barred from relief from a Second or Successive 28 USC 2255, and because the ZAHAN decision established that the statute of conviction did not cover the Physician's conduct, that claim is cognizable at habeas without a Second or Successive 28 USC 2255, nor a 28 USC 2241, and the "All Writs Act" under 28 USC 1651 does provide the needed relief with Audita Querela?

Question not identified.