Does a defendant's failure to object to a Rule 11(b)(1)(H)-(I) error count against him twice, not only by subjecting him to the rigorous plain-error standard in the first place, but also by serving as a factor that weighs against a showing of prejudice under the standard's third prong?

Does a defendant's failure to object to a Rule 11(b)(1)(H)-(I) error count against him twice by subjecting him to the plain-error standard and weighing against prejudice?