No. 25-6441
Kamlesh Banga v. Lawrence R. Lustig
IFP
Tags: article-three judicial-recommendation magistrate-judge objection-standard procedural-due-process statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court violates 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Article III when it adopts a magistrate judge's recommendation through complete judicial silence without addressing the claim at issue or responding to timely filed specific objections supported by controlling legal authority
Docket Entries
2026-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 27, 2026.
2026-01-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 28, 2026 to March 27, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 28, 2026)
Attorneys
Lawrence R. Lustig
David T. Shuey — Rankin, Shuey, Mintz, Lampasona & Harper, Respondent
David T. Shuey — Rankin, Shuey, Mintz, Lampasona & Harper, Respondent