No. 25-6444
Rashid Muhammad Abdullah v. City of Plant City, Florida, et al.
IFP
Tags: collateral-estoppel double-jeopardy due-process fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment warrantless-seizure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel or the Double Jeopardy Clause precludes re-litigation of factual determinations resolved in prior proceedings when central to a subsequent civil negligence action
Docket Entries
2026-01-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 2, 2026.
2026-01-22
Motion of City of Plant City, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2026-01-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 29, 2026 to March 2, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2026)
Attorneys
City of Plant City, et al.
Jay Daigneault — Trask Daigneault, LLP, Respondent
Jay Daigneault — Trask Daigneault, LLP, Respondent