Introductory Statement: White Castle System, Inc.'s redundant counsel improperly waived service, outside of FRCP 4(d), and nullified a summons. This case questions:

1. Whether the Clerk's Office for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri is issuing summonses correctly.

2. Whether Clerk #3, on the case management team, intentionally entered White Castle's Waiver of the Service of Summons form inaccurately on September 23rd, 2024, violating the Oath of Office of Clerks and Deputies, and furthering Clerk #3's crime, under U.S.C. § 2073, of making a fictitious record regarding proof of service documentation.

3. Whether the district court's Clerk's Office obliterated, or only concealed, White Castle's return summons, and Cochren's actual proof of service documentation, filed on October 10th, 2024, committing a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 2071.

4. Whether it is clearly erroneous to deny recording a default, under FRCP 55(a), while relying on inaccurate information entered into the court's electronic record instead of documents filed in support.

5. Whether White Castle System, Inc.'s counsel willfully violated court rules by suggesting, themselves, to respond to Cochren's complaint later than 21 days, pursuant to FRCP 12(a)(1)(A)(ii), without waiving service of a summons, before being served with process, pursuant to FRCP 4(d)(3). (Precedent setting material.)

Whether the Clerk's Office for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri improperly issued or processed summonses and service documentation