No. 25-6466
Israel Alberto Rivas Gomez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process miranda-warning right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether law enforcement's advisement to a defendant that entirely omits the "if he so desires" language regarding the right to appointed counsel satisfies law enforcement obligation to communicate the Miranda warning before interrogating an individual in its custody?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether law enforcement's advisement to a defendant that entirely omits the 'if he so desires' language regarding the right to appointed counsel satisfies law enforcement obligation to communicate the Miranda warning before interrogating an individual in its custody?
Docket Entries
2026-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-12-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 2, 2026)
2025-09-30
Application (25A369) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 28, 2025.
2025-09-26
Application (25A369) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 29, 2025 to December 28, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Israel Rivas Gomez
Ann Catherine McClintock — Federal Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent