Question 1 Concerning:
1. "Whether the state-court judgments sanctioning the transfer of real property obtained through a collusive foreclosure process denied owners of constitutionally sufficient notice or meaningful opportunity to be heard and thus violated the 'taking' Clause of the 5th Amendment, the Right to Jury Trial 7th Amendment and the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause. "
a. "Does a billion-dollar company using a defective "trustees deed upon sale " facilitated by a state-sanctioned auction constitute the unconstitutional 'taking' of private property without compensation, due process, or a jury trial per constitutional provisions?"
b. "Under state & federal property law can a large-scale institutional buyer be considered a 'good faith' purchaser if it acquires property suggestive of constructive fraud or fails to perform due diligence concerning the legitimacy of the deed before filing it in the county property register as a validated security deed? "

Question 2 Concerning:
2. "Whether an interest in property is protected in a transfer or effected by a trustee 's deed that omits the physical addresses then uses the same deed claiming a physical address using landlord-tent law to remove owners from their homes where state law provides no mechanism to challenge the transaction of there being an actual bona fide purchaser which creates a conflict within the scope of rights concerning deeds, title rights, jurisdiction, venue, or if it is valid substantiated property claim."
a. "Does the use of trustees deed upon sale without a listed physical address constitute a rental agreement with the owners of some arbitrary address not included in the deed sold at public auction? "
b. "Can a homeowner be deprived of property that was not listed in the deed of trust that was constructed for public auction? "

Question 3 Concerning:
3. "Whether the state's application of a bona fide purchaser extinguishes a valid prior interest when there is the existence of actual and constructive notice by public record, primarily title, court and bankruptcy records. "
a. "Can a state court's judgment even if flawed prevent this court from protecting petitioners and other Oregonians title claims or does the federal system not retain oversight for lower courts fundamental errors and constitutional due process concerning deed theft of homes by billion-dollar corporations disguised as land-lords that purchased invalid security deeds unfit for public auction? "

Question 4 Concerning:
4. "Whether a state court 's refusal to recognize the doctrine of inquiry notice for recorded instruments puts a reasonable person on alert of the unconstitutional 'taking' of property without due process law or a jury trial that conflicts with courts of last resort concerning fraudulent transfers."
a. "Are the state courts responsible for protecting the integrity of the public record by validating bona fide purchasers for value who have claimed to have acted in good faith with actual knowledge of prior defects and who have reasonably relied on a clear title search by balancing the law protecting the original owners rights, thereby ensuring certainty in real estate transactions for all parties? "

Whether a state-court judgment sanctioning the transfer of real property through a collusive foreclosure process violated constitutional protections of due process, property rights, and jury trial