No. 25-6496
Paul D. Carr v. Jeff Macomber, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
IFP
Tags: brady-violation criminal-procedure evidence-tampering habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pinholster-exception
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Cullen v. Pinholster decision permit an exception for federal courts to consider newly developed evidence when state court representation was inadequate?
Docket Entries
2025-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 5, 2026)
2025-11-14
Application (25A567) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 28, 2025.
2025-10-03
Application (25A567) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 29, 2025 to December 28, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.