Did the 3rd Circuit Court err by accepting District Court's interpretation on a County Prothonotary-signed court order not signed by a Judge, violating 5 U.S.C. §552a(b)(H) and causing a Circuit split?

1) Did 3rd Circuit Court err by blatantly accepting District Court ’s erroneous interpretation on a County Prothonotary-signed court order, not signed by a Judge, violating 5 U.S.C. §552a(b)(H) and causing a Circuit split? 2) Did 3rd Circuit and District Courts err in their opinion and judgement that it is “inapposite ” to D.C. Circuit ’s previous ruling on issues of material fact remaining with respect to Privacy Act violation claims in Bartel case, causing a Circuit split? 3) Did 3rd Circuit/District Courts err by implicitly accepting “COMITY ’ as a mechanism permitting agency DOE to release Privacy documents for a criminal case circumventing the exceptions under 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) (3), (7), (11), ignoring Kalkines warnings causing a Circuit split? 4) Did the 3rd Circuit/District Courts err on Privacy Act routine use under subsection 5 U.S.C. §552(e)(3)(C) for Manivannan case from previous rulings by 9th (Covert), 3rd (Britt) and D.C. (USPS) Circuits, causing a divided opinion? 5) Did the 3rd Circuit/District Courts err in not considering that the agency DOE conduct is willful in providing privacy documents for a criminal proceeding, violating Privacy Act exceptions, routine use and Kalkines!