Whether the Supreme Court should exercise supervisory authority to resolve a jurisdictional conflict between federal courts and address potential due process violations in an immigration case

1. Whether this Court should exercise its supervisory authority under 28 U.S.C. §165 1(a) to resolve a structural conflict created when two federal courts —the D.C. District Court and the Middle District of Florida —asserted jurisdiction over the same 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b) matter simultaneously, resulting in irreconcilable orders and a breakdown in the lawful allocation of federal judicial power. 2. Whether the continued suppression of Petitioner ’s federal immigration A-File by DOJ, USCIS, and DHS —despite its central role in multiple proceedings across multiple courts —constitutes a structural due-process violation that no single lower court has the authority to remedy, thereby requiring this Court ’s intervention to preserve the integrity of the federal judicial process. 3. Whether the paralysis in the D.C. Circuit, caused by DO J’s procedural default, unresolved conflicts of interest, and the inter-court jurisdictional collision involving Petitioner ’s case, presents an exceptional circumstance warranting the issuance of a supervisory writ to restore judicial functionality and ensure access to appellate review.