No. 25-6560
Tony Daniel Klein v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-defense criminal-procedure evidence-exclusion sixth-amendment witness-bias
Latest Conference:
2026-02-27
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a court violate a criminal defendant's constitutional right to present a defense by excluding circumstantial evidence, and does limiting cross-examination about witness bias violate Sixth Amendment confrontation rights?
Docket Entries
2026-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/27/2026.
2026-02-06
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-02-04
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-01-12
Motion (25M47) of petitioner for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2025-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-11-25
Motion of petitioner for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2025-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2026)
Attorneys
Tony Daniel Klein
Elizabeth Gillingham Daily — Oregon Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Elizabeth Gillingham Daily — Oregon Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Elizabeth Gillingham Daily — Oregon Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent