No. 25-6597
Daniel Duane Smith, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-validity criminal-law felony-conviction firearm-possession second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
Related Cases:
25-6594
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is constitutionally valid as applied to an individual whose only prior charged felony convictions are non-violent offenses such as Felon in Possession of a Firearm and Ammunition, DUI Drugs & Alcohol (Second Offense), Unlawful Possession of a Controlled Drug, and Home Repair Fraud.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is constitutionally valid as applied to an individual with non-violent prior felony convictions
Docket Entries
2026-01-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-26
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2026)
Attorneys
Daniel Smith
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent