No. 25-6600
Naveed Rasheed Shike v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-indictment criminal-procedure evidence-suppression judicial-review legal-dismissal suppression-motion
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Shike's suppression motion should have been granted and whether his indictment should have been dismissed
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. Whether Shike’s suppression motion should have been granted? II. Whether Shike’s indictment should have been dismissed? _¨_
Docket Entries
2026-01-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-26
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2026)
Attorneys
Naveed Shike
Sandra Eastwood — Sandra Eastwood, Petitioner
Sandra Eastwood — Sandra Eastwood, Petitioner
Sandra Eastwood — Sandra Eastwood, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent