Whether the U.S. District Court erred in holding a Batson claim procedurally defaulted due to missing voir dire transcripts and denying a Certificate of Appealability

1. In light of the missing voir dire transcript, did the U.S. n District Court erred when it held that Petitioner ’s Batson claim was procedurally defaulted because this claim was not presented on direct appeal before post conviction? 2. In light of the missing voir dire transcript, did <fihe U.S. District Court erred when it held that Petitioner's Batson claim was procedurally defaulted because this claim was not presented on collateral attack during and after post conviction? 3. Given the fact that 52% of the transcripts are missing due to negligence by the court reporter, did the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit erred by denying the Certificate of Appealability? 4. Did the U.S. District Court erred by failing to read and consider Petitioner's claim of innocence?