Whether the Court of Appeals permits an appellate court to give a notice of judgment on the theory that a prose, interpreter-assisted litigant never offered his documentary exhibits and therefore waived review where the trial transcript states that the trial court referred admissibility objecting to petitioner's Marked Exhibits to a list of production; the petitioner attempted to return to his exhibits at court into back to judgment; the trial court cut petitioner off and immediately issued judgment, only to state that the court then confirmed that the only admitted exhibits Defendant's Exhibits 1-87.

Whether the Confrontation Clause permits an appellate court to give no weight to a notary's interpretation of documentary exhibits when a pro se litigant never formally offered exhibits