(1) In light of a newly post conviction law, as established under California
Senate Hill Vo. 775, could petitioner lawfully remain convicted of an
attempted murder allegation within the meaning of a felony murder theory,
namely, penal code § 1S°?

(2) In light of "2 federal naheas Corpus Practice and Procedure § 26.4", did
the ''inth Circuit Court of Appeals current adjudication, coupled with the
district Court's recent decision denying petitioner's claim beyond addressing
the merits, further manifest a fundamental miscarriage of justice arising
from a prima facie hearing held in state court under penal code § 1172..6 (a)
(1), (3), and (e), as it directly relates to penal code § ISC?

(3) Tn light of 23 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1), (2), and (e)(1), (?)(A)(i)(ii), and (H),
did the 'Jinth Circuit Court of Appeals current adjudication, coupled with the
district Court's decision denying petitioner's claim beyond addressing the
merits, adversely infringe upon petitioner's genuine right to liberty, inclusive
to a further deprivation of petitioner's equal protection W -'ue process rights
guaranteed by the 5th and 14th amendments to the United States Constitution?

Whether a newly enacted California law (Senate Bill 775) affects a petitioner's prior attempted murder conviction under felony murder theory, and whether the Ninth Circuit's and district court's decisions infringe upon the petitioner's constitutional rights to liberty, equal protection, and due process