Whether a defendant's sentence should be adjusted for status points when the District Court failed to consider dismissed counts in calculating criminal history

&ivn(<)WineVViev' be ^-zmled sendee reducho-n uvtdeK ■sfetfus points Amendment &aJ aiad -WnaA' unde« IS U.SZ. Z&SSfa'fte) 7 reaumnq-toe Court to ronftoter “the need -toavoid unwanted sXcStupantoei «m™ defendant wrtto mW r^oreto wte^v® teen tonvnd ot-SimiW conduct«M<ch Atoo Court did hot. <x) WteW bistort Court Committed «uwhen the " lg ,.sc tactova aa Wen ,h ton-e And cannot denS rebeton toe Arrund thatreWeap?rp?nW undev-toeSa^al Whether Detendanti Sentence showtd teadjurtod tor status-points when OiotnclCourt Stated to Oetendunt W 4 she pied out-to 4 c^nte that th® otter counts o(Vle, W t‘THe couttT •. — we ^o AVtvpt^i gtU Hus»-Haose 3 dismtsseei . Tiney ’Ke^on& nihen '.twas. not as r was chaged with «U. counts <.2rt)