No. 25-665
Colin R. Covitz v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-procedure due-process military-justice post-trial-delay sentencing-relief uniform-code-military-justice
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals err when it held there was "no basis for relief" under 10 U.S.C. § 866(d)(2) merely because there was not a due process violation?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals err when it held there was 'no basis for relief' under 10 U.S.C. § 866(d)(2) merely because there was not a due process violation?
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-15
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-12-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 7, 2026)
2025-09-22
Application (25A323) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 5, 2025.
2025-09-17
Application (25A323) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 6, 2025 to December 5, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Colin Covitz
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent