No. 25-6678

Isaac Ramirez Rodriguez v. Virginia

Lower Court: Virginia
Docketed: 2026-01-30
Status: Pending
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment mandatory-minimum proportionality sentencing
Key Terms:
Punishment
Latest Conference: 2026-02-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are the mandatory minimum life sentence provisions of Virginia Code §§ 18.2-61(B)(2) and 18.2-67.2(B)(2) unconstitutional as constituting Cruel and Unusual Punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

This Court has ruled that a criminal sentence must be proportionate to the crime for which the defendant has been convicted . The question presented is: Are t he mandatory minimum life sentence provision s of Virginia Code § § 18.2-61(B)(2) and 18.2 -67.2(B)(2) unconstitutional as constituting Cruel and U nusua l Punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, making the mandatory minimum sentence of two life sentences plus 60 years plus 12 months imposed upon Petitioner in this case unconstitutionally disproportionate to the particular crimes for which he was convicted and unconstitutional .

Docket Entries

2026-02-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-30
Waiver of Virginia of right to respond submitted.
2026-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent Virginia to respond filed.
2026-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 2, 2026)

Attorneys

Isaac Rodriguez
James Chandler MartinMartin & Martin Law Firm, Petitioner
James Chandler MartinMartin & Martin Law Firm, Petitioner
Virginia
Ethan Padilla FallonVirginia Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Ethan Padilla FallonVirginia Office of the Attorney General, Respondent