No. 25-6684
Yehonatan Kapach v. New Hampshire
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process judicial-fairness jurisdiction traffic-court video-conference
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the traffic court in New Hampshire justified in denying a North Carolina resident and driver his application to appear by video conference, as it appears the NH Traffic court is set up as a trap to collect fines without actually dispensing justice or conducting real trials?
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was the traffic court in New Hampshire justified in denying a North Carlina resident and driver his application to appear by video conference, as it appears the NH Traffic court is set up as a trap to collect fines without actually dispensing justice or conducting real trials. 2
Docket Entries
2026-02-12
Application (25A908) denied by Justice Jackson.
2026-01-27
Application (25A908) for a stay, submitted to Justice Jackson.
2025-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2026)