DOES THE JUDICIAL IMMUNITY DOCTRINE HAS THE AUTHORITY TO PERMIT MALICIOUS AND CORRUPT JUDICIAL RULINGS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS ERRORS OF LAW OR MISAPPLICATION OF LAW THAT RESTRICT A LITIGANT'S ABILITY TO OBTAIN RELIEF FROM A VOID JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 60(b)(4) OF FRCP(FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE) TO A ONE YEAR PERIOD WITH DISCOVERED NEW EVIDENCE?

Does the judicial immunity doctrine improperly shield malicious and corrupt judicial rulings from review under Rule 60(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?