No. 25-67

Abhijit Bagal v. Kshama Sawant, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-07-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-challenge federal-court injury-in-fact judicial-review legal-standing standing
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What constitutes a cognizable injury to establish standing in a federal court to challenge an unconstitutional law?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. What constitutes a cognizable injury to establish standing in a federal court to challenge an unconstitutional law? 2. Whether a geographical connection to the unconstitutional law need to be demonstrated sufficiently for standing to establish a claim?

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-23
Waiver of Kshama Sawant, et al. of right to respond submitted.
Main Document
2025-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent Kshama Sawant, et al. to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2025-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 18, 2025)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Abhijit Bagal
Abhijit Bagal — Petitioner
Abhijit Bagal — Petitioner
Kshama Sawant, et al.
Kerala Thie Cowart — Seattle City Attorney's Office, Respondent
Kerala Thie Cowart — Seattle City Attorney's Office, Respondent