No. 25-6701
Eskender Getachew v. United States
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure defendant-presence jury-verdict sixth-amendment trial-court-duty
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2026-02-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a trial court has a duty to inquire into a defendant's absence before proceeding with a jury verdict when constitutional and procedural rules mandate defendant presence
Question Presented (from Petition)
Both the Constitution (through the Fifth and Sixth Amendments) and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 43) provide that a defendant “must be present” when the jury returns its verdict. If the defendant is absent, i s the trial court under a duty to make some inquiry before proceeding to the verdict? iii RELATED CASES Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 14(1)(b)(iii), Petitioner submits these cases which are directly related to this Petition: none
Docket Entries
2026-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/27/2026.
2026-02-09
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2026)
Attorneys
Eskender Getachew
Kevin Michael Schad — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Michael Schad — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Michael Schad — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent