No. 25-6718
Otto Melvin Ramirez v. United States
IFP
Tags: circuit-split deportable-alien individualized-finding sentencing-factors statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a district court violated 18 U.S.C. § 3583(c) and U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c) by imposing a term of supervised release on a deportable defendant without making an individualized finding that such supervision is necessary.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court violated 18 U.S.C. § 3583(c) and U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c) by imposing a term of supervised release on a deportable defendant without making an individualized finding that such supervision is necessary
Docket Entries
2026-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2026)
Attorneys
Otto Ramirez
Joseph Jeff Ostini — National Defense Law, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent