Whether a statute of limitations should be applied to constitutional rights violations under Article 6 and the 14th Amendment

1. While this matter does require review, the main question of “should a statute of limitations be allowed” when addressing an individual's constitutional rights especially when the plain text of article 6 and the 14th Amendment state otherwise? 2. Shouldn’t elements of 18 U.S.C. § 241 and 18 U.S.C. § 242 in a case allow for a longer statute of limitations as plaintiffs case has two defendants that require they work together for the denial of rights under color of law? 3. When the purpose of a statute of limitations is meant to preserve evidence, shouldn’t continuous litigation be allowed as a defense as the evidence is being used in other courts and other courses of litigation? 4. If everyone as a US citizen is guaranteed due process then how can anyone be denied their constitutional rights as well as due process rights?