Question not identified.

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 20, petitioner hereby further appeal the U.S. Court of Appeals judgment due to unresolved complaints (U.S. Court of Appeals Case No. 25-7106). All other Petition for a Writ of Certiorari were filed as following: Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: filed on June 27, 2023 No. 23-5501 “May Chen v. MPD ” Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: filed on August 6, 2024 May Chen v. EEOC et.al. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: filed on March 18, 2025 May Chen v. District of Columbia et.al. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: filed on Nov 3, 2025 May Chen v. M & T Bank et.al. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: filed on Nov 12, 2025 May Chen v. District of Columbia et.al. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 13, all of the above referenced petition was filed within 90 days after the issuance of judgment. Petitioner strictly followed all court rules in a timely manner. 1. Supreme Court Rule 20 and Rules of Judicial Conduct Rule 1.1, “a judge(s) shall comply with the law, including the Code of Judicial Conduct ”. For example, in regards to the subject case, judge Katsas; Walker; Childs and the U.S. Court of Appeal Clerk Clifton B. Cislak disobeys the law F, R.C.P. Rule 55 (default I default judgment) based on F. R. C. P. Rule 12 (failure to answer Summons & Complaints), F. R. App. P. Rule 31 (failure to file Reply Brief), F. R. App. P. Rule 27 (Emergency Motions) as well as all other applicable law refenced under