Whether Texas prosecutors can unilaterally change venue in a criminal case without sufficient evidentiary support and potentially violate a defendant's constitutional rights

0 fro nsQ S CL < T*— * * 2>z -4l ’ 5— * —I co O-s _ ’ $ ITS O n w -— n 9 O <t> *-< > H ro 0 3 « i> evUence of ^,'J ocKa( ,-nngcc ^e Mdever tke fM/y ei jMo/ir of MA f rorecuf^r q/i d def mJ ants'; c/iQAj t7\y Ve^ue and U^cAoye to more ead ly QcjWly Mnacenj ftMy W|,M tAere 15 ev/Jgnce tn 'H>e record to ^up^ort change c[\/enu€^icina^ z/? vola,-^ pH-Xnefcr H.t.CwrWm , Can 7?XajKftovJincjSJ s 2?o S'hqj/ QdU^T Ce^u<r€ tV>« Stater to b^Y VfflU&/\A (£i'AQ^ Clcti/S't of fAe C+A fiME^b, Col\lfT, U-^ev^i 3+oje ^(judges -pronn^uq ^onf^'\\ ft ( ( U.S, C0N-ST, /iM£A)D.£ , In all ceii^tA^/ pre recat^oA^ ( the acca^zd S'hali enjoy +he cd^ t? spetfy mJ public trial t by qn impartial Aury /of tket^A^re//) tAe cr>m& ^^11 have b^cn co mm i tte J t \Aihicb district h ail kqyc been qrcecta/he7 Ay CMe t gj/iJ rwo/>gHy e-rrfcptv< arr^TM^oJ counsel z v2-■* ^‘tbAtfld/cflnceat deaf ^fitied^r^ of l~lgb Court novZ reoi,' . . <4Q .Tf tjvA-T pe'b ’h on pF wade#h. arn-e/id ^koalJ l<he^cillyleave To fee: CvAley \A (j t bso/i f ^^5 LL $, ipy^ tpg 7g ( JP2( 2 LE12J Tkv Co^'ftu'Vton /V IA Con'fL ’rf vo'. ’fVi TT^ l^S\ \j enve)ClcM® in "fkd^ Texas fel^Tr?^ I c^A ignore (A^ec~henr -frc>ho bo^ prosecutor ah^ without ai^V A'es^' on"| f* (Word fo support a CUjeot Venue anj Lh/J^ cua c^n^e veAue//it T\a$e, for unlawful reas^As, f\o cCcx^^A aV c*U ZK,\& TT has 4^®Am e p-^ake perspnal of>uwn he Cqc the^eb^ CCirvHA(4 “bria| +0 an\| crfW ItXa s CoU^fy an J O/rfn'^t wkere cad pres'tJe. y€fllie cr.me W£>S Wt+h a jury CelecleJ-^cam-+^ vjcon^ ere fke crime tv<7£ nxf <„ '~hiCcMrn.tTej Sft l , , , can mon easily ■ • 11 <Tke? T Y Vl&ore ^M.J a^u A ypm“£y Clau3e ciTT' nG)TTc e/j^ J Zn,S lCbA!^5o Skfa jareven + Suc^ “)) ~