Question not identified.

.1 IF I HE AT oHE Po«NT ALLOWS TtlS iWSTWfe Grounds Fb& RELIEF FROm 3u<3UAEHT fNcluDlHG 1®6AL WAS Rhlb MoTioM iNSFFfeCWH AS T?B MiS^te C.LW.y ibeMTiFY^ ITSELF |F The cTaDGS' hAAOB A ■ 2. why was I The puuntffs Complaint qurifs ® m Assbohg mouy bEF^CTVB CLAIMS ON 0iMgJ> CMM AnS AtoFW BY TTfE b/sltficT Court T im®. iF rr cwub BE bmWM^eb T< TH£R£ WAS hWGuuW/ im 3. IF TftE cases . RUNG NuiMBf/ was hteTMiZED ANb MW® 'For An alt&R eg© Procmping ^why bibVr THs District court APPoiN/T A biFFEWNT T\AbG£. T> TME THE Case TTtB?EAF®R MobiFYiMG THE DlSPoSiTioU ? f IF ANY G(?out4^ FoR REMEF APPeA^D WlM on THE MSRiTs WHY WM ithe PiMWifFis Basis THS claim bssiWAB® w a eF Pieo MBAMNG WHAT Go^aU^ Mfl> CoULbfTT BE RiSGA'RbEb °F-THE LAW AnD ^DLl PF L^W ? 5 IF ExH-AUSHohi ^>F RSIAEWS WAS N6T A^ilABLE WHY Am I WH PLAiimfF WUM WAS WT buRJNfc IWfe LOU^P wr — — < iD^mW h-we PLAiimFFAs'WBe^OAwr U why w ths District Tudge idbnt‘^7 -EskrF UiJF FAiL0>To TbsWY ^ELlfcr n<©^a iwl puRtM 6 ^iNAL Tvb&E ? • oP£RATIC?^ TW&TubG&M0« •(■.. “"wEMORANbuM Pertain he-To the JobCMEhn^y o* those matters go ONAMHtMSb P*a* AaJti ^aFFE^lHS-TRfiMASfe on; S1F THE AVTeft .TX dSaX^dT® BE wttfetftWS Rs* &ROUP '*