Salena Nicole Glenn v. Erin Maldonado, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Does the warrantless seizure, arrest, and search of a legally parked vehicle occupant without probable cause or reasonable suspicion violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures?
1. Does the warrantless seizure, arrest, and no search warrant of a legally parked vehicle occupant-without probable cause or reasonable suspicion! violate the Fourth Amendment ’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE DOCTRINE 2. Does the use of instant excessive force and pointing a firearm at an unresisting American citizen in a non-threatening context-constitute a violation of clearly established constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments . 3. Does a conviction obtained despite post-conviction evidence including third party confession and exculpatory evidence testimony from law enforcement, violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Brady Violation . 4. Does a lower state court establish due process, in the term of separating a joint indictment violating Due Process Clause , without a motion filed! also the concern of deviation from the person of interest who admitted to committing the crime. Confrontation Clause 5. Does failure of trial counsel not requiring preservation of evidence for further review, and compelling confessions of the crime deprive petitioner of a fair trial, effective assistant of counsel, and due process. Sixth Amendment 6. Does a Federal courts refusal to grant Habeas Corpus relief, despite compelling exonerating evidence of actual innocence, undermine fundamental fairness and violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments . i.