No. 25-680
Bernard T. Swift, Jr., et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Amici (1)
Tags: administrative-procedure internal-revenue-code penalty-assessment statutory-construction supervisory-approval tax-law
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When must an IRS employee secure written supervisory approval for a penalty assessment to be valid?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
This case presents a conflict regarding an important question of statutory construction under the Internal Revenue Code. The Code provides that no penalty shall be assessed unless the initial determination of such assessment is personally approved in writing by an immediate supervisor. Courts of Appeals have diverged on when an IRS employee must secure supervisory approval for a penalty assessment to be valid. The question presented is: When must an IRS employee secure written supervisory approval for a penalty assessment to be valid?
Docket Entries
2026-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 13, 2026.
2026-01-30
Motion of Federal Respondents for an extension of time submitted.
2026-01-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 11, 2026 to March 13, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2026-01-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 11, 2026.
2026-01-09
Brief amicus curiae of Donald Miller, Jr. filed.
2026-01-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 12, 2026 to February 11, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 12, 2026)
Attorneys
Bernard T. Swift, Jr., et al.
Donald Miller, Jr.
Joshua Stephen Johnson — Vinson & Elkins LLP, Amicus
Joshua Stephen Johnson — Vinson & Elkins LLP, Amicus
Joshua Stephen Johnson — Vinson & Elkins LLP, Amicus
Federal Respondents
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent