Was the definition of malice given to the jury a proper Virginia model jury instruction defining heat of passion, and did counsel for appellant request a proper, specific, and complete jury instruction defining heat of passion, and did the trial court err by allowing Commonwealth Jury Instruction '#14'?

1) Was the definition of malice given to the jury a proper Virginia model jury instruction defining heat of passion? 2) Did counsel for appellant request a proper, specific, and complete jury instruction defining heat of passion? 3) Did the trial court error by allowing Commonwealth Jury Instruction “#14”?