Whether the Eleventh Circuit's claim of forfeited appellate rights and refusal to conduct de novo review violated due process and equal protection, creating a dangerous precedent

1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit’s claim that a litigant has forfeited her appellate rights and its refusal to conduct the required de novo review on a motion to dismiss, not only violated Petitioner’s due process rights and denied her equal protection under the law, but also created a dangerous precedent which would allow lower courts to wholly disregard this Court’s established precedent and foreclose all further appellate review. 2. Whether this Court’s recent decision in Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. V. Wullschleger, 604 U.S. 22 (2025), raises a new issue of whether Petitioner’s supplemental state law claims should have been dismissed without prejudice where the Eleventh Circuit did not revive the federal claims thereby making the state claims supplemental to nothing and where the District Court failed to conduct an independent analysis of the state law claims. ii LIST OF DIRECTLY