No. 25-690

Ryan Thornell, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al. v. Bradley Bieganski

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-12-12
Status: Pending
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: burden-shifting constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ninth-circuit-review
Latest Conference: 2026-04-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Ninth Circuit fail to apply the correct deferential standard of review, as set out in 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), and also misapply this Court's precedents, set out in Martin and Patterson, regarding when an affirmative defense improperly shifts the burden of proof to a criminal defendant, in violation of the Due Process Clause?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Ninth Circuit fail to apply the correct deferential standard of review under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) and misapply Supreme Court precedents regarding burden-shifting in criminal cases?

Docket Entries

2026-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
2026-03-23
Reply of petitioners Ryan Thornell, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2026-03-23
Reply of Ryan Thornell, et al. submitted.
2026-03-11
Brief of respondent Bradley Bieganski in opposition filed. (Corrected)
2026-03-11
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Bradley Bieganski.
2026-03-11
Motion of Bradley Bieganski for leave to proceed in forma pauperis submitted.
2026-03-11
Brief of Bradley Bieganski in opposition submitted.
2026-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 11, 2026.
2026-01-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 9, 2026 to March 11, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2026-01-30
Motion of Bradley Bieganski for an extension of time submitted.
2026-01-09
Response Requested. (Due February 9, 2026)
2026-01-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/23/2026.
2026-01-05
Waiver of right of respondent Bradley Bieganski to respond filed.
2025-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 12, 2026)
2025-11-06
Application (25A523) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 10, 2025.
2025-11-04
Application (25A523) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 10, 2025 to December 10, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Bradley Bieganski
Randal Boyd McDonaldLaw Office of Randal B. McDonald, Respondent
Ryan Thornell, et al.
Jason Dale LewisArizona Attorney General's Office, Petitioner