No. 25-6940
Response RequestedResponse WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, or under what circumstances, individuals can be criminally prosecuted for failing to comply with a licensing scheme that contains a facially unconstitutional licensing standard?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether individuals can be criminally prosecuted for failing to comply with a licensing scheme that contains a facially unconstitutional licensing standard
Docket Entries
2026-04-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 15, 2026, for all respondents.
2026-04-02
Motion of Hon. Letitia James, New York State Attorney General for an extension of time submitted.
2026-04-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 15, 2026 to May 15, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2026-03-16
Response Requested. (Due April 15, 2026)
2026-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2026.
2026-03-10
Waiver of New York of right to respond submitted.
2026-03-10
Waiver of right of respondents New York, et al. to respond filed.
2026-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent Hon. Letitia James, New York State Attorney General to respond filed.
2026-02-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 2, 2026)
Attorneys
Hon. Letitia James, New York State Attorney General
Matthew Keller — Office of the New York State Attorney General, Respondent
Barbara Dale Underwood — New York Solicitor General, Respondent
New York
Emily Anne Aldridge — Bronx County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Yael Vida Levy — Bronx County District Attorney, Respondent
Omar Johnson
Matthew Joseph Bova — Center for Appellate Litigation, Petitioner