No. 25-7057

Dianne Michele Carter v. April Maryam Kaiser, et al.

Lower Court: North Carolina
Docketed: 2026-03-18
Status: Pending
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process-clause fourteenth-amendment judicial-transparency procedural-dismissal right-to-be-heard state-court-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2026-04-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits a
state court to dismiss a litigant 's case on procedural grounds without affording the
litigant any opportunity to respond to the asserted defect.

2. Whether due process is satisfied when a state court enters a procedural
dismissal without providing any explanation for its ruling, thereby preventing the
litigant and reviewing courts from understanding or evaluating the basis for the
judgment.

3. Whether unexplained state-court dismissals that deny both participation and
transparency present a federal question reviewable by this Court when no state
court has issued a reasoned decision.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits a state court to dismiss a litigant's case on procedural grounds without affording the litigant any opportunity to respond to the asserted defect, and whether due process is satisfied when a state court enters a procedural dismissal without providing any explanation for its ruling

Docket Entries

2026-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2026.
2026-04-01
Waiver of April M. Kaiser, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2026-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent April M. Kaiser, et al. to respond filed.
2026-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2026)

Attorneys

April M. Kaiser, et al.
Emma Nicholle WingfieldTeague Campbell Dennis & Gorham LLP, Respondent
Dianne M. Carter
Dianne Michele Carter — Petitioner