Does a court have the obligation to address the specific argument presented in a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to preserve the petitioner's rights to due process and of access to the courts? And,

Is a sentencing court obligated under the Fourteenth Amendment and Fifth amendment right to due process to comply with ALL mandatory statutory provisions (state created liberty interest) prior to sentencing an offender? And,

Is it a violation of an offender's right to due process to pronounce an adult prison sentence without first defining the conviction of a crime? And,

Does the sentencing of an adult to seven years of incarceration after the adjudication for juvenile behavior had expired represent double jeopardy?

Whether courts must address specific habeas corpus arguments and comply with mandatory statutory sentencing provisions to preserve due process rights, and whether sentencing an adult to incarceration based on expired juvenile adjudication constitutes double jeopardy