No. 25-712
Sandra Hernden v. Chippewa Valley School District, et al.
Tags: adverse-action circuit-split constitutional-law first-amendment governmental-action retaliation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a referral by a governmental official to another official for potential criminal investigation constitutes adverse action under First Amendment retaliation doctrine in the absence of an actual investigation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
In light of our current toxic and vindictive politics and a circuit split, under test, does a referral by one governmental official to another governmental official for a potential criminal investigation constitute adverse action sufficient to meet the elements of a First Amendment retaliation claim where there is no indication that the petitioner was ever investigated?
Docket Entries
2025-12-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 19, 2026.
2025-12-22
Motion of Chippewa Valley School District, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2025-12-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 20, 2026 to February 19, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 20, 2026)
Attorneys
Chippewa Valley School District, et al.
Kenneth Bennett Chapie — Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C., Respondent
Lindsay Paige Hazen — Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C., Respondent
Lindsay Paige Hazen — Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C., Respondent
Kenneth Bennett Chapie — Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C., Respondent
Sandra Hernden
Patrick J. Wright — Mackinac Center Legal Foundation, Petitioner
Patrick J. Wright — Mackinac Center Legal Foundation, Petitioner