1. What is the ''Threshold" for Abuse of Discretion when a District Court
issues a decision based on obvious Erroneously Assessed Evidence or
outdated information?

2. Does an Affirmation of a lower court's decision by an Apellate court
constitute Abuse of Discretion within itself when an appellate review
for the same would've indicated the obvious Abuse of Discretion by the
lower court?

Whether a district court abuses its discretion by issuing a decision based on erroneously assessed or outdated evidence, and whether an appellate court's affirmation of such a decision constitutes abuse of discretion when appellate review would have revealed the lower court's obvious error