1. Should the Court assign counsel for an innocent, upstanding, highly contributing immigrant scientist (and his sister and uncle in India - the other two petitioners) as well as his three businesses (that are currently in hiatus and financial ruin given the fact that the owner/ chief operating officer petitioner Jayakrishnan Nair has been disabled and staying at a nursing home, as well as the fact that businesses cannot be represented by pro-se parties, while the businesses have inherent value of several millions if not billions as can be seen from Appendix 5), who has become disabled from a recent heart attack requiring 7 stents, kidney problems, C-PTSD & severe depression due to one of the worst barbaric persecution of innocent humans in the history of the American judicial system since the Salem witch trials, wherein his hemiplegic (yet verbal, alert and cognizant, able to hold articulate and deep conversations, and had retained full control of her right hand so also able to read and write) mother was held hostage incommunicado at a secret location for nearly five years (wherein she was never allowed any contact with any family despite being known to be pleading in tears every waking minute to meet her children) and tortured, blinded on the right eye, scalded with boiling water when she begged for water after being abandoned to die of dehydration, made catatonic with the muscle relaxant Dantrolene Sodium (so she cannot scream) and presented to criminals in a homeless shelter as a sex toy wherein her lips were parted and bleeding all over from perverts molesting and assaulting her , diapers never changed so she was mired in her own excreta for days [see photos in Appendix 4-E1, all in violation of various treaties that USA is a party to {including Indo-USA treaties- see The Treaty of Peace, Friendship, and Commerce between the United States and India (1950) & U.S.- India Social Security Agreement (2008), various United Nations agreements that both USA and India are party to - for e.g. see Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Vienna Convention on the law of treaties (1969), et al}, various Federal statutes such as the 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as well as Constitutional rights (5th, 14th and 8th amendments) ONLY FOR THE DASTARDLY PURPOSE of stealing from his entirely self-built $10 Million+ estate in which she had no standing (as she never made a penny in the USA nor transferred a penny to USA as a tourist on a visitor visa who was only in the country to spend time with her beloved son), before she was brutally murdered by her State-appointed guardian (appointed pursuant to a settlement - as can be seen from the safe website www.saveomana.in ) as soon as the last asset from her son's estate (a 6-bed luxury golf course home) was seized and sold ?

2. Should this Court, the highest authority of the land for safeguarding the integrity, credibility and enforceability of the Federal Statutes, Treaties and the Constitution, act on its own commission Sua Sponte , given the circumstances and evidences in this matter irrefutably point to the fact that the legal system in Washington State has been gravely compromised due to the most abominably shameless racketeering, corruption and naked self-dealing by certain vilely unscrupulous elements infesting the courts who have partnered with convicted pedophiles and felons

Question not identified.