No. 25-7172
Tyrone Grailford v. United States
IFP
Tags: alternative-sentence appellate-review criminal-procedure harmless-error sentencing-discretion sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether errors in calculating the Sentencing Guidelines are rendered categorically harmless by the district court's statement that the Guidelines would make no difference to the choice of sentence.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether errors in calculating the Sentencing Guidelines are rendered categorically harmless by the district court's statement that the Guidelines would make no difference to the choice of sentence
Docket Entries
2026-03-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 11, 2026)
Attorneys
Tyrone Grailford
Emily Deck Harrill — Fedearl Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent