Whether the 12.9.25 Order is void and 21-1597 is still stayed, as 11 USC 362 Stay cannot be lifted, sua sponte, nunc pro tunc, by a bankruptcy judge, or an appellate court.

Whether USCA7 failed to apply subject matter jurisdiction analysis to 19cv0827 Complaint, improperly relying on res judicata and issue preclusion.

Whether lack of competing claims is lack of Article III controversy and bars rule or statutory interpleader jurisdiction.

Whether the "Mack Bar" as applied to Gomez is incongruous with alleged offense, and unconstitutionally bars Petitioner's right to defend in civil matters or appeals.

Question not identified.