2a).Whether the United States District Court of Eastern Pennsylvania district judge Murphy upheld the constitutional and statutory right in the United States District Court of Eastern Pennsylvania ,my right to petition the government for redress grievance in civil litigation proceedings In pursuant to 28U.S.C.section 1331 in which states district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.

2b).WhetherThe United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals L.A.R. 34.1(a) had appellate jurisdiction to review my appeal in pursuant to number and composition of venue in pursuant to 28U.S.C.section 41, of The United States thirteen Circuit Courts of Appeals

2c) Whether both United States trail district court and Third Circuit appellant Court L.A.R. 34.1(a)(local appellant Rule) violated Federal Rules of civil and appellant procedure and the United States Constitution of America, in allegedly Illegally misleading the process of litigation and jurisdiction venues. By using tactics of the old abolished tradition of judicial code of 1911of circuit riding, merging trail and circuit courts.

Whether the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals violated petitioner's constitutional right to petition for redress of grievances and federal procedural rules by allegedly exceeding their jurisdictional authority and engaging in abuse of discretion in civil litigation proceedings